Skip to content
Docket Build

Merit-based classification

EB-1A Extraordinary Ability

EB-1A requires sustained national or international acclaim. Absent a one-time major award, the petition must satisfy at least three of ten regulatory criteria at step one, after which USCIS conducts a final merits determination on the totality of the evidence at step two. The two-step structure is what makes EB-1A packets so large: the same exhibit often supports several criteria and then has to be re-argued in the final merits section.

Governing standard

Kazarian two-step review against ten regulatory criteria

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3); Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010)

Denial rate after RFE
26.9%
Median processing
214 days
Form
I-140
Initial RFE rate
28.4%
Median exhibit pages
610
Manual assembly
22 hrs
On Docket Build
55 min

Statutory criteria

What the record has to establish.

Each element below is a mapped criterion in the Docket Build criteria pack, with its citation and the evidence types that satisfy it.

01

Criterion i — Lesser nationally or internationally recognised awards

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(i)

  • Award certificates
  • Award selection criteria and field of competition
  • Press coverage of the award
02

Criterion ii — Membership requiring outstanding achievement

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(ii)

  • Membership certificates
  • Bylaws showing the achievement requirement
  • Evidence of who judges admission
03

Criterion iii — Published material about the beneficiary

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(iii)

  • Articles with title, date, author and translation
  • Circulation or readership evidence for the outlet
04

Criterion iv — Judging the work of others

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(iv)

  • Peer review invitations
  • Completed review confirmations
  • Panel or committee appointment letters
05

Criterion v — Original contributions of major significance

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(v)

  • Independent expert letters
  • Citation analysis
  • Adoption, licensing or commercialisation evidence
06

Criterion vi — Scholarly articles

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(vi)

  • Publication list
  • Journal impact factors
  • Authorship position analysis
07

Criterion vii — Artistic exhibitions or showcases

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(vii)

  • Exhibition catalogues
  • Venue significance evidence
08

Criterion viii — Leading or critical role

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(viii)

  • Organisational charts
  • Letters from organisation leadership
  • Evidence of the organisation's distinguished reputation
09

Criterion ix — High remuneration

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(ix)

  • Compensation records
  • Comparative wage surveys for the field and geography
10

Criterion x — Commercial success in performing arts

8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(x)

  • Box office receipts
  • Sales and streaming figures

Failure modes

What actually draws a request on a EB-1A.

Compiled from the request language our customers record on their own matters and from published AAO decisions in this classification.

Full RFE trends hub
  • Exhibits stacked under a criterion without argument on why they satisfy it
  • Reliance on citation counts alone for original contributions of major significance
  • Expert letters from co-authors or direct collaborators presented as independent
  • No separate final merits determination section in the cover letter
  • Media exhibits with no evidence of the outlet's circulation or significance

Document checklist

What a complete filing carries.

Full printable checklist →

Identity and eligibility

  • Passport and I-94

    Full travel history for status continuity

  • Curriculum vitae

    Reconciled against every exhibit — dates and titles must match

  • Form I-140 draft

    Preference category and priority date fields verified

Criteria evidence

  • Criterion evidence bundle (min. 3 criteria)

    Each criterion tabbed as its own second-tier exhibit

  • Independent expert letters

    Six to ten, with signed CVs as sub-exhibits

  • Citation and impact report

    With capture date and self-citation exclusion stated

  • Media coverage with translationswhere applicable

    Title, date, author and outlet significance for each

Final merits and intent

  • Statement of intent to continue work in the field

    Signed by the beneficiary

  • Prospective work evidence

    Offer letters, contracts, funding or business plan

  • Comparative eminence evidencewhere applicable

    Where the beneficiary sits relative to the field

Start free trial

Stop losing flat-fee profit to manual PDF formatting.

Upload one messy client folder. Get back an audit-ready, Bates-stamped exhibit packet with a two-tier index and a matched cover letter — in about three minutes.

14-day free production trial · no card · real matters · no watermark

Software for licensed attorneys. Not legal advice.

Docket Build is legal technology software designed for use by licensed attorneys and legal professionals. Docket Build does not provide legal advice, does not practice law, and does not create an attorney–client relationship. All legal theories, filings, and petitions must be reviewed and approved by a qualified attorney.