Skip to content
Docket Build

Measure

Track firm drafting velocity and RFE outcomes.

Most firms cannot answer what a petition category actually costs them to assemble, or which service center is issuing their requests. Both are knowable, and both change how a partner prices work.

Practice analytics — trailing 90 days

Westbrook & Mireles LLP · 6 attorneys · 3 paralegals

Petitions filed
117
Assembly hours reclaimed
1,397
Flat-fee revenue
$509k
Blended RFE rate
7.2%
CategoryFiledHours beforeHours nowRFE rateAssembly cost / matter
EB-2 NIW2418 hrs54 min8.3%$41$810
EB-1A922 hrs66 min11.1%$50$990
O-1A1416 hrs48 min7.1%$36$720
H-1B418 hrs30 min4.9%$23$360
L-1A1112 hrs36 min9.1%$27$540
I-130 / I-485189 hrs30 min5.6%$23$405

Synthetic firm data. Your own dashboard is built from your filings — no benchmarking pool, no cross-firm data sharing.

Four questions

What partners actually want to know.

What does an EB-1A really cost us to assemble?

Average assembly time by petition category, converted to burdened labour cost, compared against the flat fee charged. The answer is usually higher than the partner's estimate.

Which paralegal turnaround is slipping?

Time from matter opened to packet ready for review, by staff member and by category — a workload signal rather than a performance ranking.

Where are our RFEs coming from?

RFE rate by visa category and by adjudicating service center, with the request reason where your team records it. Service centers vary measurably for the same petition shape.

Which engagements are actually profitable?

Fee minus assembly cost minus RFE response cost, per matter and per category. Some categories that feel lucrative are not, and some routine work is.

Data boundary

Your numbers stay yours.

A benchmarking product would be more marketable and we decided against building one. Firms filing petitions under an attorney's name should not have their outcome data pooled, even anonymously, and the value of a comparison against a synthetic peer group is not worth that trade.

Full data handling posture

No. Your dashboard is built only from your firm's filings. There is no benchmarking pool, no anonymised aggregate and no cross-firm data sharing. The published RFE database is compiled from public USCIS adjudication data, never from customer filings.

Start free trial

Stop losing flat-fee profit to manual PDF formatting.

Upload one messy client folder. Get back an audit-ready, Bates-stamped exhibit packet with a two-tier index and a matched cover letter — in about three minutes.

14-day free production trial · no card · real matters · no watermark

Software for licensed attorneys. Not legal advice.

Docket Build is legal technology software designed for use by licensed attorneys and legal professionals. Docket Build does not provide legal advice, does not practice law, and does not create an attorney–client relationship. All legal theories, filings, and petitions must be reviewed and approved by a qualified attorney.